Editorial Policy

Useful First Search Second

AceRank publishes public pages to answer real fan questions and explain real product experiences. Pages should be accurate, distinct, readable, and honest about what is official, community-reported, or strategic opinion.

Maintained by the AceRank Editorial Team ? Last reviewed July 27, 2026

01

People-first scope

A page must satisfy a distinct search and user need. AceRank avoids mass-producing near-identical event variants, doorway pages, unsupported WTA or ATP claims, and pages that exist only to repeat a keyword.

02

Sources and fact checks

Stable tournament facts should be checked against official tournament or tour information where practical. Strategy sections are presented as guidance, not certainty. Live schedules, draws, results, ticket rules, and venue notices should defer to official sources.

03

Automation and editorial responsibility

Automated tools may assist with drafting, formatting, testing, and identifying inconsistencies. AceRank remains responsible for the published result. Generated copy should not invent affiliations, authors, reviews, ratings, quotes, statistics, or product capabilities.

04

Commercial and affiliation disclosure

AceRank is an independent, unofficial fan application. Public editorial pages avoid betting language and do not imply endorsement by players, tours, or tournaments. In-app cosmetic currency is not cash and is not described as a wager.

05

Corrections

Confirmed errors should be corrected in the page, not hidden behind a new duplicate URL. Materially revised pages receive an updated review date. Users can use the support channels linked in the product to report an issue.